What to Know About the Colorado Springs Assault on Hunting Meadows Circle

On June 6, 2025, a disturbing and unusual assault rattled the Hunting Meadows Circle neighborhood in Colorado Springs. According to a report by KKTV 11 News, a man was arrested after allegedly kidnapping a woman and riding on the roof of a moving vehicle as it traveled down Chelton Road. The incident unfolded in broad daylight and ended with the suspect being taken into custody after a chaotic sequence of events that drew a swift response from the Colorado Springs Police Department.

This case has sparked widespread public attention not only for its bizarre circumstances but also for the serious nature of the allegations. Charges in the case include assault, kidnapping, and reckless endangerment offenses that carry severe consequences under Colorado law. For residents of Colorado Springs, the case serves as a reminder of the importance of personal safety and the need to understand the legal protections available to assault victims and those accused of violent crimes.

At Liberty Law Center, we understand how overwhelming it can be to face criminal charges, especially when the situation spirals out of control as it did in this case. If you or a loved one is facing assault charges in Colorado Springs, legal representation is critical. Our experienced defense attorneys can help you navigate the criminal justice system and fight for the best possible outcome.

Contact Liberty Law Center today at (719) 569-4475 or visit our contact page for a confidential consultation.

Details About the Assault Incident on Hunting Meadows Circle

The June 6, 2025, incident in Colorado Springs captured public attention due to its unpredictable nature and the serious criminal charges involved. As the story continues to unfold, it’s critical to examine the facts of the case, the timeline of events, and the broader safety implications for the Colorado Springs community.

What Happened on June 6, 2025

According to KKTV 11 News, officers with the Colorado Springs Police Department responded to reports of a man riding on top of a moving vehicle near Chelton Road. The man, who was later identified as the suspect, allegedly forced a woman into the car against her will, prompting witnesses to call 911. Video footage and bystander statements quickly corroborated the shocking sequence of events.

The vehicle, with the suspect clinging to the roof, moved erratically through the residential streets before law enforcement intervened. Police officers located and detained the individual, who now faces multiple felony charges. Investigators confirmed that the woman involved did not consent to the suspect’s actions, triggering a formal kidnapping investigation.

Location of the Assault

The incident began near Hunting Meadows Circle, a quiet residential area in southeastern Colorado Springs. This location, which connects to nearby Chelton Road, is generally known for its suburban character. You can view the exact location using Google Maps. The proximity to schools, shopping centers, and densely populated housing developments made the event especially alarming for residents.

The unusual behavior of the suspect, coupled with the location’s high visibility, meant the situation escalated quickly. Law enforcement emphasized their commitment to rapid response and praised community members for alerting authorities promptly.

Initial Police Response and Arrest

The Colorado Springs Police Department acted swiftly, dispatching multiple units to contain the situation. Upon arrival, officers separated the parties, assessed the threat level, and took the man into custody without further incident. A detailed investigation followed, including witness interviews and forensic examination of the scene.

Law enforcement officials noted that cooperation from residents played a key role in ensuring public safety. According to the Colorado Bureau of Investigation, community reports often provide the first line of defense in preventing escalating violence in domestic or interpersonal conflict situations.

Charges the Suspect May Face

Although the full scope of charges has not yet been confirmed, early reports suggest the man may face felony-level offenses including second-degree kidnapping (C.R.S. § 18-3-302), third-degree assault (C.R.S. § 18-3-204), and reckless endangerment (C.R.S. § 18-3-208). Each of these charges carries significant penalties under Colorado law.

For instance, second-degree kidnapping is classified as a Class 2 or Class 3 felony depending on aggravating factors, and may result in years of imprisonment and heavy fines. The Colorado General Assembly’s website offers detailed statutory language that defines these offenses and their associated sentencing ranges.

Understanding Assault Charges in Colorado

Assault charges in Colorado are among the most serious criminal allegations an individual can face. They can stem from a wide variety of circumstances, including domestic disputes, public altercations, and unusual incidents like the June 6, 2025, case in Colorado Springs. Understanding how Colorado law defines assault, the different degrees of charges, and the potential penalties is essential for anyone facing or witnessing such an event.

How Colorado Defines Assault Under State Law

In Colorado, assault refers to the act of knowingly or recklessly causing bodily injury to another person. The Colorado Revised Statutes define three main degrees of assault, each carrying different legal consequences. You can view the full statutory definitions in Colorado Revised Statutes Title 18, Article 3.

Third-degree assault is the least severe but is still classified as a misdemeanor that can lead to jail time. Second-degree assault, often charged in cases involving significant bodily harm or the use of a deadly weapon, is considered a felony. First-degree assault, which involves serious bodily injury with intent and aggravating factors, is among the most serious non-homicide charges under Colorado law.

Third-Degree Assault in Colorado

Third-degree assault is typically charged when someone knowingly or recklessly causes bodily injury without using a deadly weapon. Although classified as a Class 1 misdemeanor, it is considered an “extraordinary risk” crime in Colorado, which can increase the maximum jail sentence.

According to C.R.S. § 18-3-204, third-degree assault includes knowingly causing pain, illness, or any impairment of physical or mental condition. In practice, this can apply to physical shoving, slapping, or other aggressive actions that leave visible or medically verifiable injury. While it may not carry the same weight as a felony, the conviction still results in a criminal record and can disqualify individuals from employment, housing, and even firearm ownership under federal law.

Second-Degree Assault and Its Legal Impact

Second-degree assault involves a higher degree of harm or intent than third-degree assault. This charge often arises in cases involving weapons, intoxication, or attacks on law enforcement officers. It is classified as a Class 4 felony, with the potential to increase to a Class 3 felony depending on specific aggravating circumstances.

The statutory language for second-degree assault can be found in C.R.S. § 18-3-203. The law outlines various scenarios that can qualify for this charge, including intentionally causing bodily injury with a weapon or recklessly causing serious injury under circumstances showing extreme indifference to human life.

In the context of the June 6, 2025, incident, second-degree assault may be relevant depending on the level of harm inflicted on the victim and whether any objects or forceful conduct were used during the kidnapping.

First-Degree Assault and Severe Felony Consequences

First-degree assault is among the most serious violent crimes prosecuted in Colorado. It typically involves intentionally causing serious bodily harm using a deadly weapon or demonstrating an extreme indifference to the value of human life. This charge is a Class 3 felony and, under certain circumstances, can escalate to a Class 2 felony.

The full legal text is available via C.R.S. § 18-3-202. The statute makes clear that the severity of the injury and the intent behind the assault are the deciding factors in the charge classification. Penalties can include 10 to 32 years in prison, along with fines of up to $750,000 and mandatory parole. This type of assault often results in the loss of civil rights, including the right to vote or possess firearms, especially under the Colorado Felony Sentencing Guidelines.

Special Considerations for Assault on Protected Persons

Colorado imposes harsher penalties for assaults committed against protected individuals. These include peace officers, emergency medical providers, judges, and firefighters. Assaults against these groups may lead to mandatory sentencing and reduced chances of parole.

The Colorado District Attorneys’ Council emphasizes the importance of protecting first responders and public officials from targeted violence. In any case where a protected party is the victim, the state is more likely to pursue aggravated charges, increasing the urgency for a solid legal defense.

The Role of Mental State in Assault Cases

An individual’s mental state at the time of the incident plays a crucial role in how charges are filed and prosecuted. Colorado law differentiates between intentional, knowing, reckless, and criminally negligent actions. Each mental state carries different implications for sentencing and potential defenses.

The Colorado Judicial Branch outlines these distinctions in jury instructions, helping determine how jurors interpret the defendant’s actions. For instance, reckless behavior, such as jumping onto a moving vehicle, may not show specific intent to harm but could still qualify for felony assault depending on the outcome of that behavior.

Assault Involving Domestic or Intimate Relationships

In many assault cases, particularly those involving alleged kidnappings or confined spaces, the individuals involved know each other. Colorado law allows for enhanced charges if the incident qualifies as domestic violence. This doesn’t change the degree of assault, but it does trigger mandatory arrest laws and protection order requirements.

The Colorado Coalition Against Domestic Violence (Violence Free Colorado) provides detailed resources on how assault charges interact with domestic violence statutes. Victims in these cases often receive additional protections, while defendants face increased restrictions, including the possibility of mandatory counseling and firearm relinquishment.

Potential Sentences and Collateral Consequences of Assault Convictions

The penalties for an assault conviction in Colorado vary based on the degree of the charge and any aggravating factors. Beyond incarceration and fines, individuals often face lasting social, financial, and legal consequences.

An assault conviction can appear on background checks indefinitely, making it difficult to find employment or housing. Many landlords and employers rely on records maintained by the Colorado Bureau of Investigation for screening purposes. Additionally, federal regulations often bar individuals with certain violent convictions from receiving government benefits, financial aid, or professional licenses.

Kidnapping and Related Offenses in Colorado

Kidnapping is one of the most serious criminal charges under Colorado law. In the June 6, 2025, Colorado Springs assault case, the suspect’s actions led police to investigate potential charges of second-degree kidnapping, a felony offense that carries substantial legal consequences. To understand the gravity of this charge, it’s important to explore how kidnapping is defined in Colorado, how it differs from other related offenses, and what legal defenses may apply.

How Colorado Law Defines Kidnapping

Colorado law distinguishes between first-degree and second-degree kidnapping based on the circumstances and intent behind the act. Both degrees involve unlawfully moving or confining another person, but the level of force, threat, and outcome determines how prosecutors charge the case.

The statutory definitions can be found in C.R.S. § 18-3-301 and C.R.S. § 18-3-302, which outline the key differences between the two.

First-Degree Kidnapping Under Colorado Law

First-degree kidnapping occurs when a person forcibly seizes and carries another individual from one place to another with the intent to demand ransom or to inflict injury. This is a Class 1 or Class 2 felony, depending on whether the victim was released unharmed.

According to the Colorado General Assembly, first-degree kidnapping charges often apply in ransom situations, prolonged detentions, or cases involving physical or sexual abuse. This level of kidnapping carries penalties that can include life imprisonment, especially if the act involved bodily harm or the use of a deadly weapon.

Second-Degree Kidnapping in Domestic and Public Contexts

Second-degree kidnapping, which is more commonly charged, occurs when a person knowingly seizes or carries another person without lawful consent or justification. In many domestic or interpersonal conflict situations, this is the statute under which charges are filed.

In the June 6 incident, the fact that the woman was allegedly forced into a vehicle against her will may satisfy the requirements of second-degree kidnapping. As defined in C.R.S. § 18-3-302, this offense becomes a felony when the individual moves any distance, however slight, without consent.

If the alleged victim is a child or if the incident includes any aggravating factor such as a weapon, the charge becomes a Class 2 felony. In less severe scenarios, it may be prosecuted as a Class 4 felony. Either charge can still lead to years of imprisonment and long-term restrictions on civil rights.

The Role of Movement and Confinement in Kidnapping Charges

Kidnapping requires the movement or confinement of another person without their consent. Even minimal movement, such as forcing someone from one room to another, can qualify if done unlawfully. Courts look at whether the movement increased the risk to the victim or facilitated the commission of another crime.

The Colorado Judicial Department provides juries with specific instructions to determine whether the movement was significant enough to justify a kidnapping conviction. In the June 6 case, police allege that the woman was not only confined but also transported through traffic while the suspect rode on the car’s roof, creating an exceptionally dangerous situation for everyone involved.

Legal Penalties and Sentencing for Kidnapping in Colorado

The penalties for kidnapping in Colorado are among the harshest in the state’s criminal code. Depending on the degree and aggravating factors, sentencing can include mandatory prison terms, parole restrictions, and substantial fines.

Class 2 Felony Kidnapping and Its Consequences

A Class 2 felony is one of the most serious levels of criminal offenses in Colorado. Sentencing can range from 8 to 24 years in prison, with mandatory parole periods extending for 5 years or more. If the offense involved a deadly weapon or resulted in serious bodily injury, the court may impose even stricter sentences.

The Colorado Sentencing Guidelines outline these consequences in detail and guide judges during sentencing. A conviction of this magnitude also eliminates eligibility for certain probationary or diversionary programs, and it imposes a permanent criminal record.

Class 4 Felony Kidnapping and Lesser Sentences

If prosecutors file second-degree kidnapping charges as a Class 4 felony, the potential penalties range from 2 to 6 years in prison and fines up to $500,000. While this is less severe than a Class 2 felony, it still carries serious implications.

Judges may consider mitigating factors such as the absence of violence, the defendant’s lack of criminal history, or evidence of mental health issues when determining sentencing. Nevertheless, a felony conviction under any circumstance results in permanent restrictions on employment, housing, and civil liberties, including gun ownership.

Related Charges Commonly Filed with Kidnapping

In many cases, kidnapping is accompanied by other serious charges, especially when the alleged conduct includes violence, threats, or reckless behavior. In the June 6 assault, law enforcement indicated that multiple charges were being considered, which is common in complex criminal cases.

False Imprisonment as a Lesser Offense

False imprisonment is often charged when the circumstances do not meet the movement requirement for kidnapping, but still involve unlawful confinement. This is a lesser offense under C.R.S. § 18-3-303, which classifies it as a misdemeanor unless force, threat, or restraint are involved.

In cases involving former partners or roommates, false imprisonment may be charged instead of or alongside kidnapping. Although less severe, it still carries the potential for jail time and court-mandated behavioral programs.

Menacing and Coercion Charges

Menacing involves placing another person in fear of imminent serious bodily injury, often through the use of threats or weapons. This offense is defined under C.R.S. § 18-3-206 and may be charged when intimidation plays a significant role in forcing someone to act against their will.

Coercion, while similar, focuses on the use of threats to compel specific behavior, such as forcing someone into a vehicle. The Colorado Legal Services website explains that both offenses are often prosecuted in tandem with kidnapping when intimidation or fear was used as a tool of control.

Collateral Consequences of a Kidnapping Conviction

The legal penalties for kidnapping extend far beyond jail time and fines. A conviction affects nearly every aspect of the defendant’s life, including employment, family relationships, and public reputation.

Loss of Civil Rights and Firearm Restrictions

Anyone convicted of a felony in Colorado loses the right to vote while incarcerated, serve on a jury, or possess a firearm. The Colorado Secretary of State outlines these restrictions, which remain in place during incarceration and parole. In kidnapping cases involving a weapon, these rights are often permanently revoked.

Immigration and Federal Consequences

Non-citizens convicted of kidnapping or similar offenses face serious immigration consequences. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) may initiate deportation proceedings or deny applications for visas, green cards, or citizenship. Under federal law, kidnapping is considered a crime of moral turpitude and can permanently bar re-entry to the United States.

Impact on Child Custody and Family Court Cases

A kidnapping conviction can significantly affect parental rights. Colorado family courts take such charges seriously when determining custody, visitation, or guardianship. The Colorado Judicial Branch’s Family Law Division provides resources to help parents understand how criminal charges influence custody determinations.

Legal Defenses to Assault and Kidnapping Charges in Colorado

Being charged with assault or kidnapping does not automatically mean a conviction will follow. Under Colorado law, defendants have a constitutional right to defend themselves against criminal allegations, and numerous legal defenses may apply depending on the facts of the case. Building an effective defense requires a detailed understanding of statutory law, constitutional protections, and courtroom procedure.

The Role of Intent in Criminal Defense Strategy

One of the most critical factors in assault and kidnapping cases is the defendant’s mental state or lack of intent to commit a crime. In Colorado, most violent crimes require proof that the defendant acted knowingly or intentionally.

Proving Lack of Criminal Intent

For both assault and kidnapping charges, prosecutors must show that the accused acted with intent to harm or unlawfully restrain another person. If the defense can present evidence that the conduct was accidental, misinterpreted, or lacked intent, the charges may be reduced or dismissed.

According to the Colorado Jury Instructions, intent must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. This legal standard offers the defense an opportunity to raise doubt through witness testimony, video evidence, or psychological evaluations that suggest diminished capacity or misunderstanding.

Constitutional Challenges to the Charges

Defendants also have powerful protections under the U.S. Constitution and the Colorado State Constitution. Violations of these rights during arrest or investigation can result in the exclusion of evidence or dismissal of charges altogether.

Fourth Amendment Violations in Search and Seizure

One of the most common constitutional defenses involves the Fourth Amendment right against unlawful search and seizure. If police arrested the suspect or searched property without a warrant or proper legal justification, any evidence obtained may be inadmissible in court.

The ACLU of Colorado explains that traffic stops and arrests must be based on probable cause, and police must follow strict procedures when detaining or searching individuals. In cases like the Colorado Springs incident, the defense may challenge how the suspect was identified, detained, or questioned.

Miranda Violations and Involuntary Statements

Under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments, law enforcement must inform suspects of their right to remain silent and to have an attorney present during questioning. If a defendant made self-incriminating statements before receiving a proper Miranda warning, those statements may be excluded from trial.

As the Colorado Public Defender’s Office points out, this defense is especially powerful in high-pressure arrests where confusion, fear, or coercion may cause someone to speak without understanding their rights.

Self-Defense and Defense of Others

In some assault cases, the defendant may admit to physical contact but argue that the actions were taken in self-defense or defense of another person. Colorado law permits individuals to use reasonable force to prevent imminent harm.

Colorado’s “Make My Day” and Use-of-Force Statutes

Colorado has several statutes that protect individuals who use force under lawful circumstances. For instance, C.R.S. § 18-1-704 allows the use of force when a person reasonably believes it is necessary to protect themselves or someone else from unlawful force.

However, the use of deadly force or restraint must be proportional to the threat. If the force used was excessive or unnecessary, the defense may not apply. In situations where an alleged victim initiated contact or behaved aggressively, this defense can be especially relevant.

Consent and Misunderstanding as a Defense

In kidnapping or false imprisonment cases, the issue of consent often becomes a focal point. If the alleged victim willingly entered a vehicle, engaged in physical contact, or moved locations voluntarily, the defense may argue that no unlawful confinement occurred.

The Importance of Verbal and Non-Verbal Cues

The Colorado Criminal Jury Instructions instruct jurors to consider whether the victim’s behavior suggested consent. The defense may present texts, calls, or surveillance footage showing that the person did not express objection at the time of the incident. Inconsistencies in the victim’s testimony can also cast doubt on the prosecution’s narrative.

This defense may not lead to a full dismissal, but can result in lesser charges or a favorable plea agreement.

Insufficient Evidence and Prosecutorial Burden

Every defendant in Colorado is presumed innocent until proven guilty. If prosecutors fail to meet their burden of proof, the case should not proceed to conviction.

Challenging Witness Credibility and Forensic Evidence

Defense attorneys often focus on the reliability of prosecution witnesses and the accuracy of any forensic evidence. For example, medical reports alleging injury may be inconsistent with police reports or video evidence. If law enforcement failed to properly document the scene or interview key witnesses, the defense can use these gaps to challenge the prosecution’s case.

Resources from the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers emphasize that defense teams should request full discovery, including police bodycam footage, lab results, and dispatch recordings. A thorough analysis of the evidence may reveal inconsistencies or violations that weaken the state’s position.

Mental Health and Diminished Capacity

In rare cases, a defendant’s mental health may serve as a mitigating factor. If a person was suffering from a psychological disorder or could not understand the nature of their actions at the time of the incident, they may be eligible for mental health defenses or alternative sentencing.

Court-Ordered Evaluations and Psychiatric Reports

Under C.R.S. § 16-8-101.5, the court may order a psychological evaluation if there is reason to believe the defendant was mentally impaired during the alleged offense. If the court determines the person could not form criminal intent, the charges may be reduced or the defendant may be diverted into a mental health program.

This does not excuse criminal behavior, but it offers a more rehabilitative approach, particularly for first-time offenders or individuals with documented psychiatric conditions.

The Criminal Justice Process for Assault and Kidnapping Cases in Colorado

Facing assault or kidnapping charges in Colorado is a life-altering event that initiates a complex legal journey through the state’s criminal justice system. From arrest to potential trial, every stage requires strategic decision-making, legal representation, and a thorough understanding of your rights. Knowing what to expect can reduce uncertainty and help defendants take control of their legal defense early on.

Arrest and Booking Procedures in Colorado Springs

Most criminal cases begin with an arrest, often at the scene of the incident. On the June 6, 2025, Colorado Springs case, officers responded immediately and detained the suspect on-site. During an arrest, police must follow constitutional procedures, including use-of-force limitations and probable cause requirements.

What Happens During the Booking Process

Once arrested, the individual is transported to the El Paso County Jail, where the booking process takes place. This includes fingerprinting, mugshots, personal information collection, and an inventory of possessions. The El Paso County Sheriff’s Office oversees booking for most arrests in Colorado Springs. Defendants may remain in custody until they see a judge for a bond hearing or are released on personal recognizance.

Bond Hearings and Pretrial Release

Within 48 hours of arrest, the defendant appears before a judge for a bond hearing. The judge evaluates whether the accused can be released pending trial and under what conditions.

Setting Bail in Felony Cases

For serious charges like second-degree kidnapping or felony assault, bail is not guaranteed. The judge considers multiple factors, including prior criminal history, the severity of the allegations, flight risk, and ties to the community. Under C.R.S. § 16-4-104, the judge has discretion to set monetary bail, order pretrial supervision, or deny bond in high-risk cases. A qualified defense attorney can present mitigating information to secure the most favorable terms possible.

Formal Arraignment and Charges

Once released or if remaining in custody, the defendant attends a formal arraignment where they hear the official charges and enter a plea. At this stage, it is vital to have legal representation to protect against self-incrimination and procedural mistakes.

Pleading Not Guilty and Invoking Rights

Most defendants plead not guilty at arraignment, triggering the formal pretrial process. This allows defense counsel to file discovery requests, suppression motions, and begin negotiations. The Colorado Courts website provides full access to criminal procedure rules that govern this phase. The court may also issue a mandatory protection order under C.R.S. § 18-1-1001 preventing contact with the alleged victim.

Pretrial Motions and Evidence Discovery

During the weeks following arraignment, attorneys from both sides exchange evidence. This phase is critical to building a defense and preparing for negotiations or trial.

Motion Hearings and Suppression Requests

Defense attorneys may file motions to suppress unlawfully obtained evidence or exclude testimony based on procedural violations. If successful, suppression motions can severely weaken the prosecution’s case. For instance, if video footage was collected without consent or Miranda warnings were not properly issued, the court may prohibit its use in the trial.

The National Center for State Courts emphasizes that pretrial motions often shape the trajectory of criminal cases, making this phase a strategic battleground for experienced lawyers.

Plea Negotiations and Diversion Options

Not every criminal case proceeds to trial. Prosecutors frequently offer plea bargains to reduce court caseloads, and in some cases, to offer leniency in exchange for cooperation or rehabilitation efforts.

Evaluating Plea Deals for Felony Offenses

In assault and kidnapping cases, plea negotiations may result in reduced charges, such as lowering kidnapping to false imprisonment or substituting felony assault with a misdemeanor harassment charge. However, defendants must weigh the consequences carefully. A plea still results in a conviction and may carry jail time, fines, or probation.

The Colorado Criminal Defense Bar recommends a thorough review of all evidence before accepting any plea and urges defendants to avoid deals that do not align with long-term legal goals.

Diversion and Deferred Sentencing Programs

In rare cases, non-violent offenders or individuals with mitigating circumstances may qualify for diversion programs. These alternatives focus on rehabilitation and may include therapy, anger management, or community service. Successful completion can result in dismissal of charges or record sealing.

The Colorado Judicial Branch’s Diversion Programs page provides details about eligibility and structure. These programs are typically unavailable for violent crimes like felony assault or kidnapping, but judges have discretion in certain borderline cases.

Trial Procedure in Colorado Felony Cases

If the case proceeds to trial, the court will schedule hearings for jury selection, evidence presentation, and closing arguments. Defendants have the right to a speedy trial, a public hearing, and representation by legal counsel.

Jury Selection and Opening Statements

During jury selection, both prosecution and defense attorneys can challenge potential jurors for bias or conflict of interest. This ensures a fair and impartial panel. The trial begins with opening statements that lay out each side’s theory of the case.

The American Bar Association emphasizes the strategic importance of jury selection and first impressions during trial. Defense attorneys often use this phase to begin introducing reasonable doubt.

Witness Testimony, Cross-Examination, and Evidence

The prosecution presents witnesses, including law enforcement, alleged victims, and medical experts. The defense then cross-examines them to challenge credibility or expose inconsistencies. Both sides may introduce physical evidence, surveillance footage, and expert testimony.

Colorado follows strict rules for evidence admissibility, which are outlined in the Colorado Rules of Evidence. If the court finds that evidence was mishandled or obtained unlawfully, it may be excluded from the record.

Sentencing and Post-Trial Proceedings

If the jury returns a guilty verdict or the defendant accepts a plea, the court proceeds to sentencing. Sentencing occurs at a separate hearing where both sides may present arguments for aggravation or mitigation.

Sentencing Factors in Felony Assault and Kidnapping

For serious felonies, the judge considers statutory sentencing ranges, prior convictions, and whether the crime involved violence, weapons, or harm to a protected class. Victim impact statements are often read aloud. Under the Colorado Sentencing Grid, Class 2 felony kidnapping may lead to up to 24 years in prison, while second-degree assault carries 2 to 6 years, depending on enhancements.

Appeals and Post-Conviction Relief

If the defendant believes their trial included legal errors, they have the right to appeal. Appeals are filed with the Colorado Court of Appeals and may address issues such as ineffective counsel, improper jury instructions, or new evidence.

The Colorado State Public Defender offers guidance on filing post-conviction motions and seeking relief in appropriate cases.

Take the First Step Toward Defending Against Colorado Springs Assault Charges

If you or a loved one is facing assault, kidnapping, or any related criminal charges in Colorado Springs, the stakes are incredibly high. These charges can result in life-changing penalties, including years of imprisonment, permanent loss of civil rights, and a criminal record that follows you forever. But you don’t have to face this process alone.

We don’t believe in one-size-fits-all legal advice. Every case is unique, and we take the time to listen to your story, investigate the facts, and build a personalized defense strategy that gives you the best possible chance at a favorable outcome. Whether you’re charged with second-degree kidnapping, felony assault, or facing a mix of serious allegations, we are ready to act quickly and aggressively on your behalf.

Don’t wait until it’s too late. Early intervention is one of the most important steps you can take. Contact Liberty Law Center today for a confidential, no-obligation consultation with a dedicated Colorado Springs criminal defense attorney.

Call us at (719) 569-4475 or visit our contact page to schedule your consultation.